Eventually, this sludge builds up, and it can interfere with the primary function of the structure. It reduces the overall volume of the storage that would otherwise be occupied by the microbial community that treats the manure, leading to brief, incomplete treatment or digestion of the manure. For this reason, sludge removal should be part of a manure management plan.
Built up over time
During a Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Community webinar, University of Missouri extension professor Teng Lim shared an example of a farm that found themselves with a bad sludge situation. On this dairy in Missouri, manure was flushed from the freestall barn three times per day into a lagoon that was 400 feet long by 280 feet wide, with a depth of 10 to 12 feet. The estimated volume was 7.5 million gallons.
Lim said an elevated screen system failed and was eventually abandoned, which led to more solids entering the lagoon. The pit was agitated each year prior to emptying, but there was significant build up of sludge over time, and by 2020, islands of manure could be seen in the middle of the lagoon.
To remedy this situation, a plan was created. First, the sludge was sampled and the volume was estimated. Lim said this sampling was done by an experienced crew. In all, 24 readings were planned with an estimated cost of $2,600. Unfortunately, the sampling boat repeatedly got stuck in the lagoon, limiting the number of samples that could be taken.
From the samples that were collected, moisture content was found to be 86%, 94%, and 88% for the sludge mounds, the lagoon center, and the shore samples, respectively. This means the sludge contained between 6% and 14% solids. The contractor hired to do the job normally pumped at 5% to 8% solids, so water from a nearby pond would be brought in to dilute the lagoon effluent and prevent clogging the system.
The farm’s fields were also sampled to determine application rates for 200 of their own acres, according to their nutrient management plan. Manure would also be applied to 400 acres on a neighboring farm.
Moving the manure
To start the job, the lagoon was agitated using a remote control boat and two PTO-run agitation pumps. A trailer mounted pump was used to remove manure, along with a dilution pump to bring in the pond water. Booster pumps were used for fields farther from the farm to maintain a flow of 1,800 gallons per minute. The manure was transported to fields using draghoses and was injected with a toolbar pulled behind a tractor.
Lim said it is important to sample the effluent during application. In this case, samples were collected at the primary pump at least once a day, measuring nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, pH, moisture content, and more. Even with agitation, there was still a significant amount of fluctuation in nutrients applied day to day. Lim noted that real time nutrient measurements taken in the field would be valuable for adjusting application rates more quickly.
The effluent was applied at an average rate of 25,000 gallons per acre. Over eight days, around 8 million gallons of manure were applied. The overall cost of the removal was $151,000.
Lim said one lesson learned was that complete agitation and homogeneity was very difficult to achieve with this amount of sludge, which was recognized by the varying sample results. Furthermore, the nutrient management plan and land application piece is very important to ensure effective recycling of the nutrients. He stressed the need to work with a custom applicator that has the equipment, experienced crew, and reputation to get a job like this done.
The moral of the story is to not let solids build up to this level. This dairy installed a pull-plug sediment basin system (on.hoards.com/pull-plug) to help remove solids from the manure flush water and keep them out of the lagoon. Lim said this system, which cost the farm about $26,000, is relatively easy to operate and, along with scheduled lagoon clean outs as needed, should help prevent this sludgy situation from happening again.
This article appeared in the August 2022 issue of Journal of Nutrient Management on page 19. Not a subscriber? Click to get the print magazine.